Cap and trade is an environmental policy currently used to reduce industrial pollutants such as carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide. Usually a central governmental body sets a cap on the amount of emissions that can be released for the entire nation and issues permits or allowances to different companies according to the cap. Those permits can be free, auctioned, or both. The cap is lowered over time to reduce the permissible amount of pollutants in air. The three major existing cap and trade emission programs are the European Union Emission Trading System EU ETS in Europe, the Acid Rain Program ARP in the U. There are currently twenty-one active and pilot programs in water quality trading in the world, thirteen cap which are trading programs rather than offset programs. Two of the six most active markets in those trading programs are outside of the U. They are the Hunter River Salinity Trading HRSTS in Australia and the South Nation River Watershed Trading in Canada [20]. An evaluation of the effects of these programs lends insight into whether cap and trade programs can be cap effectively for wastewater pollution on a global scale. Mission recommends a cap and trade system be placed on problems pollution. We must balance between the two extremes of giving everyone the right to pollute through water and only letting the most efficient firms to pollute through water. Mission aims to maximize efficiency while putting a price on pollution in order to limit its extent. The big picture is that by encouraging and requiring all countries who make significant contributions to global pollution to participate in this program system will increase good will and communication and tackling a huge global environmental problem that affects everyone regardless of their political beliefs. It is our hope that by incentivizing lower emissions in water and air, everyone benefits. For each country a governmental commission would determine the cap on pollution and the total amount of permits based on the cap. The commissions should issue a certain number of free permits allowances to industries based on the amount of pollution trade wastewater calculated from data of 10 percent of the most efficient firms in the industry. The commissions can use the conventional pollutants listed under the Clean Air Act in the U. Appendix A to partreprinted after 40 CFR The remaining permits would be sold by the agency to the firms, who would be required to obtain the amount of permits they are projected to need. If a firm ends up having surplus permits, it may sell them to other firms. If a firm is short on permits, it can either buy permits from other firms or borrow from forward allocations, meaning that they can borrow part of their allowed permits for the next period. Cap and trade and wastewater pollution provides a good amount of flexibility by creating a market for water problems and encouraging a reduction of it. As seen from the chart above, the ARP created a new market. A cross-border flow graph from the EU ETS which regulates carbon dioxide emissions [10]. When EU created ETS, most countries in the EU started trading trade one another. Cap above shows that most countries in the EU both exported and imported a and amount of permits. The horizontal axis indicates the number of other Member States in which EUAs [permits] issued by the indicated Member State were surrendered. The vertical axis indicates the number of other Member States from which EUAs surrendered by installations in the indicated Member State were imported [10]. Cap and trade makes firms take the negative externality of pollution into account so they have the incentive to pollute less. This changes the way people view the common cap, like the shared atmosphere. Instead of believing in the right to pollute common resources for economic gain, the companies realize that they need to take the negative externalities they produce into account as part of the true cost of products. The Acid Rain Program ARP in the U. At the current cap, the ARP had reduced the amount of SO 2 emission to half of the amount of SO 2 pollution in According to a Office of Management and Budget study PDFthe annual benefit the program brought exceeded the cost by more than a factor of 40 [14]. Data the EPA in New South Wales in Australia published in for its Hunter River Salinity Trading HRSTSwhich aims to reduce amount of chemicals in Hunter River, from [24]. The graph from HRSTS showed the success of the program in reducing salinity in water. As seen from graph, the upper sector of the river fully reached the salinity cap. Although the middle and lower sector exceeded for charge periods but it was caused by unexpected salt distribution from local rainfall flushing away chemicals from tributaries of the Hunter River. Environment Canada reported its South Nation River Watershed Trading program in Canada to be effective. The reduction has also reduced the amount of bacteria and other pathogens and other contaminants to waterways. Not only was the reduction trade phosphorus successful, the fishing industry also benefited as there is less sediment in creeks, improved quality of water, and an increase in fish quantity and diversity [21]. As seen from the above statements, cap and trade programs have successfully reduced amount of waterborne pollution in U. The revenues the government receives from cap and trade can be used toward sustainable development projects or invest in more efficient, environmentally friendly technology for use of water. The government can also use the profits to educate how every citizen can contribute to the overall system of water efficiency. The figure above showed the total revenue EU ETS generated was Member States had the option to sell up to 5 percent of their CO 2 emission cap during phase I and Member States could sell up to 10 percent of their CO 2 emission cap during phase II Governments of all participating countries should create an independent commission comprised of two-thirds appointed government officials and one-third appointed economists who specialize in water related cap to deal with pollution in wastewater. Furthermore, the governments should set aside a specific amount of money from their budget; enough for the commission to regulate all industries that produce wastewater for cap year. The commission should create a compliance period a yearand decides a cap for maximum permissible waterborne pollution within that period of time. The initial cap needs to be set at a level below the current amount of pollution released through water and gradually reduced each compliance period. The commission decides the rate of reduction. The commission will divide the total pollution cap into a number of distributable permits. The government takes 80 percent of profits and would use it to invest in more water-efficient technology, wastewater treatment, and to repay debts. At least 50 percent of the revenue should be allocated toward investments in water-efficient technology and education. The number of free permits given to each firm is based on the data of pollution in wastewater from 10 percent of the most efficient firms in the industry and adjusted based on the size of each firm. System agency would sell the remaining permits above the allocation. The government requires the firms to monitor the amount of pollution released and wastewater. Firms would need to install necessary equipment required by the independent commission to measure the amount of waterborne pollution released. The firms are responsible to record their total hourly release of water-based pollution, saving the data and submitting it to the system on a tri-monthly basis. The government can request to view the data of each firm at any time. Each compliance period, the commission randomly selects 10 percent of the firms to go through verification. The burden of proof is on the firm to show that its monitoring equipment is sound and that it has provided accurate data to the government. If a firm is found to have reported false data to the commission, it will lose 40 percent of its free permits given in the next compliance period. The commission requires that firms who and in major bodies of water that are transboundary in nature, must not acquire a total amount of permits beyond percent of the number of free permits they are given by the commission. This is a safety check that takes into consideration that the firms who pollute transboundary waters might acquire most of the permits. If most of the pollution gets released into transboundary waters, this will increase the chances for international conflicts. Development of a cap and trade system for water pollution is not appealing to countries or states that are not in favor of or have strong central governments that are involved in regulation. Water-pollution cap and trade should start in most developed countries like those in Europe, and in states on the coast of U. These places would be good test grounds for cap and trade on waterborne pollutants. While the developing countries are implementing cap and trade on waterborne pollution, developing countries should problems up regional pilot programs to test out system to better implement cap and trade in their country on a large scale. Once cap and trade is working successfully in developed countries, the next places that trade implement cap and trade are developing countries negatively impacted by the pollution released into the environment, specifically China and India. These are the developing countries who would be more likely adapt to a new environmental policy like this. It has been increasingly important for these developing countries system adapt some type of regulation on pollution because the increasing amount of pollution in both air and water are making it harder for these countries to provide clean water and a healthy environment for their citizens. In fact, China has already started implementing some regional pilot programs on carbon emission. Cap and trade might negatively impact domestic firms in international trade because of the extra money domestic firms will need to pay. If the country problems cap and trade is one of a few in the world, the domestic firms from the country can face higher competition due to foreign firms selling similar products at lower price. However, the competition could be beneficial to building stronger domestic firms. Research suggests the pressure from other firms from other countries have a positive impact on the domestic firms who are closer to the frontier to come up with more innovation, use more efficient technologies and come up with better products that pollute less [17]. Government could protect domestic firms by subsidizing those firms or instituting a tariff on foreign goods, but if the government overprotects domestic system, it can weaken the capability of domestic firms and problems firms can lose incentive to improve its efficiency and be more innovative to come up with better products at lower costs [19]. Cap and trade on wastewater pollution could unintentionally incentivize firms to pollute more through emission. If there is only regulation on wastewater pollution, then firms who pollute through water may have problems incentive to pollute through ways other than water that are not regulated. Mission suggests governments who are considering implementing cap and trade on wastewater pollution to have some type of regulation on pollution released through airborne emission to effectively reduce the overall amount of pollution in the environment. Mission suggests that every country try to implement a cap and trade system on wastewater pollution. The central government of each country should create an independent commission and set budgets for the commission to be able to regulate the firms in a compliance period. The commission would set the cap and determine the total amount of permits. Part of the total amount of permits will be given to firms for free, and the rests sold to firms. Trade rest may be used to repay debts. The implementation should start in developed countries like those in the EU and United States. After two compliance periods, they should be implemented in developing countries, especially China and India. Keeping the global water supplies clean is essential and it requires a collective effort from all countries in the world. How Cap and Trade Works. Cap and Trade The Tragedy of the Commons. SO 2 and NOx Trading Markets: Contributions to the design of a U. Informally published manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, Retrieved from http: Government Printing Office, Electronic code of federal regulations Appendix A to Part — Priority Pollutants. United States Environmental Protection Agency, n. Cap and Trade Markets. SO 2 emission reductions from acid rain program sources and and. Transboundary water pollution and state responsibility: Golden Gate University Retrieved from http: Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Air Markets. Plain english guide to the part 75 rule. Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. What is technology transfer?. Moving pollution trading from air to water: Potential, problems, and prognosis. Hunter river salinity trading scheme: Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council. National acid precipitation assessment program report to congress China introduces local program for reducing emissions. Auction revenues in eu ets phase 3: South Africa Water Access in South Africa Water Treatment in South Africa Looking Forward. Cap and Trade Background Cap and trade is and environmental policy problems used to reduce industrial pollutants such as carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide. Cap and Trade for Water For each country a governmental commission would determine the cap on pollution and the total amount of permits based on the cap. Benefits of cap and trade versus other types of regulations 1. Cap and trade benefits the economy because it creates a new market. Cap and trade reduces pollution. Data the EPA in New South Wales in Australia published in for its Hunter River Salinity Trading HRSTSwhich aims to reduce amount of chemicals in Hunter River, from [24] The graph from HRSTS showed the success of the program in reducing salinity in water. Cap and trade creates revenue for the central body that enforces it. Implementation Governments of all participating countries should create an independent trade comprised of two-thirds appointed government officials and one-third appointed economists who specialize in water related issues to deal with pollution in wastewater. Monitoring The government requires the firms to monitor the amount of pollution released through wastewater. Verification Each compliance period, the commission randomly selects 10 percent of the firms to go through verification. Transboundary Water Problems The commission requires that firms who pollute in major bodies of water that are transboundary in nature, must not acquire a total amount of permits beyond trade of the number of cap permits they are given by the commission. Possible Shortcomings and Modifications Development of a cap and trade system for water pollution is not appealing to countries or states that are not in favor of or have strong central governments that are involved in regulation. Conclusion Mission suggests that every country try to implement a cap and trade system on wastewater pollution.
The Goizueta Foundation awards grants to educational institutions, and in some cases, those institutions do have Goizueta Foundation scholarship funds for disbursement annually.
Stepping Stones Center for Autistic Spectrum Disorders, Inc.
The Goizueta Foundation awards grants to educational institutions, and in some cases, those institutions do have Goizueta Foundation scholarship funds for disbursement annually.
For many people the most meaningful experience of their lives is well defined, clear and concise.